Thermal imaging, acoustic correlation, and GPR are our three most-requested technologies. Each has strengths and limitations. Here's how they compare.
| Factor | Leak.ca | Alternative Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Moisture mapping, slab leaks, roof surveys | Thermal: surface moisture. Acoustic: pressurized pipes. GPR: subsurface targets |
| Detects water directly? | Thermal: yes (temperature differential). Acoustic: yes (sound of escaping water). GPR: no (sees pipes/voids, not water) | Only thermal and acoustic detect water directly |
| Depth capability | Thermal: surface only. Acoustic: up to 15m+ pipe depth. GPR: up to 6m subsurface | Each excels at different depths |
| Accuracy | Thermal: within inches. Acoustic: within 30cm. GPR: within 5-10cm horizontal | All highly accurate in right conditions |
| Best combined with | Acoustic + GPR for slab leaks. Thermal + acoustic for wall/ceiling leaks. GPR + acoustic for underground leaks. | Combined approach always outperforms single method |